So I was recently
watching a TED talk video about a full functioning school system 'in the
cloud'. The guy presenting, Sugata Mitra presented his solutions to the issue
of a lack of accessibility to schooling in remote areas and the redundancy of
modern schooling in places you actually can access it. You can check out the
TED talk here. Mitra explains that
in times when the technology we have today wasn't available the modern
schooling system was developed to help create a global communication system. This
required everyone to have these three skills: to read, have nice handwriting
and able to calculate mathematic problems.
From this he reasons that since
today we have computers to type with and do maths for us we no longer require
this schooling system. His solution? Schooling in the clouds, this focuses on
using the internet to let kids teach themselves complex ideas like the
composition of cells, what an electron does etc. and more importantly giving
every child the opportunity to participate.
The groups
dis-empowered in this issue are the children living without access to modern
education systems, and conceivably the children with it are empowered. However
a point Mitra made with his talk was to say that even the empowered are
dis-empowered by their education system being semi redundant. So the issue at
hand is more complicated, it's not a just an issue of making the dis-empowered
more empowered or modern education more available but fixing what modern
education actually is by integrating the use of our digital communication
system.
My opinions on the
issue and Mitra's solution are mostly supportive except when it comes to what
the school in the cloud seemingly assumes. I agree with changing our current
education system to fit a modern world that has only just started growing, however I
disagree that his school in the cloud is a complete curriculum.
I acknowledge
that right now it is a very good idea and can supply and empower children all
over the world with the use of technology but being taken on as a standard is
where I start seeing problems. I can research and learn (remember) anything
from the internet by myself in half an hour sure, but whether I actually
understand the information is questionable. I believe teachers as a sort of
mediation is fundamental to learning. I think a better
investment in time would not be googling answers to a teacher's questions but
spending it on personal projects based on interests and getting hands on
experience.
Even though learning
through the internet is useful and definitely relevant in today's education, it
should not be based solely on this as a source of knowledge. Learning by doing
is my favourite method. For example I want to make films, yet the information I
could get from a hundred internet searches and books is nothing compared to the
method I teach and develop myself when trying to make films.